<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Metacircular thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metacircular.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metacircular.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>On optimization, learning, and programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Stooping to posting YouTube videos by Tizseedo</title>
		<link>http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/03/11/stooping-to-posting-youtube-videos/#comment-8027</link>
		<dc:creator>Tizseedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/03/11/stooping-to-posting-youtube-videos/#comment-8027</guid>
		<description>Извините если не в тот раздел просто хотела донести до большего количества людей кто сидит на одноклассниках!
Недавно искала по блогам что пишут про одноклассники и нашла вот такой блог,  некоего Романа..сначала не поверила что он там пишет но сама лично проверила,
 не пожалела времени, оказывается &lt;b&gt;любая личная переписка&lt;/b&gt; доступна любому постороннему человеку!
 В его блоге сможеет сами убедиться в этом
 http://www.klassblog.tk

П.Ы. Если модеры против, пожалуйста удалите ссылку, пишите тогда в пм скину через личку.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Извините если не в тот раздел просто хотела донести до большего количества людей кто сидит на одноклассниках!<br />
Недавно искала по блогам что пишут про одноклассники и нашла вот такой блог,  некоего Романа..сначала не поверила что он там пишет но сама лично проверила,<br />
 не пожалела времени, оказывается <b>любая личная переписка</b> доступна любому постороннему человеку!<br />
 В его блоге сможеет сами убедиться в этом<br />
 <a href="http://www.klassblog.tk" rel="nofollow">http://www.klassblog.tk</a></p>
<p>П.Ы. Если модеры против, пожалуйста удалите ссылку, пишите тогда в пм скину через личку.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stooping to posting YouTube videos by julia</title>
		<link>http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/03/11/stooping-to-posting-youtube-videos/#comment-8026</link>
		<dc:creator>julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/03/11/stooping-to-posting-youtube-videos/#comment-8026</guid>
		<description>Приглашаю в гости на шикарный отдых.http://devochki.ru/showanketbynum.php?Num=69098</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Приглашаю в гости на шикарный отдых.http://devochki.ru/showanketbynum.php?Num=69098</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Joe Gregorio&#8217;s clever alternative to CAPTCHAs by Татар</title>
		<link>http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/17/joe-gregorios-clever-alternative-to-captchas/#comment-8025</link>
		<dc:creator>Татар</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/17/joe-gregorios-clever-alternative-to-captchas/#comment-8025</guid>
		<description>Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on F# vs. Scala: an uninformed comparison by Learning Scala from a Java perspective &#124; Thushan Fernando Uncut</title>
		<link>http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/11/f-vs-scala-an-uninformed-comparison/#comment-8024</link>
		<dc:creator>Learning Scala from a Java perspective &#124; Thushan Fernando Uncut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/11/f-vs-scala-an-uninformed-comparison/#comment-8024</guid>
		<description>[...] Scala is all about the OO and F# is more about writing in a functional perspective. But here&#8217;s an article from 2007 that may give you a better idea or Brandon Werner&#8217;s article comparing the functional [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scala is all about the OO and F# is more about writing in a functional perspective. But here&#8217;s an article from 2007 that may give you a better idea or Brandon Werner&#8217;s article comparing the functional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Learning Lift – Step 0: Part a) Give a shit about the Java programming language by Randin</title>
		<link>http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/learning-lift-%e2%80%93-step-0-part-a-give-a-shit-about-the-java-programming-language/#comment-8023</link>
		<dc:creator>Randin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/learning-lift-%e2%80%93-step-0-part-a-give-a-shit-about-the-java-programming-language/#comment-8023</guid>
		<description>So I&#039;m assuming, in the end you did not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m assuming, in the end you did not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do all Rich Internet Applications technologies suck? by The really bad guy</title>
		<link>http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/05/do-all-rich-internet-applications-technologies-suck/#comment-8022</link>
		<dc:creator>The really bad guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/05/do-all-rich-internet-applications-technologies-suck/#comment-8022</guid>
		<description>Hey, Warren. This post is just another proof of how limited you are, when it comes to technology. Flex and not stable? OpenLaszlo and not stable? Well, maybe a bit less stable then Flex, but still better than stupid JavaScript hacking. Go and bury yourself in your old technology graveyard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Warren. This post is just another proof of how limited you are, when it comes to technology. Flex and not stable? OpenLaszlo and not stable? Well, maybe a bit less stable then Flex, but still better than stupid JavaScript hacking. Go and bury yourself in your old technology graveyard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scala makes XML processing easy by Monomorphic &#8212; First steps with Scala: XML pull parsing</title>
		<link>http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/04/scala-makes-xml-processing-easy/#comment-8021</link>
		<dc:creator>Monomorphic &#8212; First steps with Scala: XML pull parsing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/04/scala-makes-xml-processing-easy/#comment-8021</guid>
		<description>[...] queries in Scala, which probably makes my pattern matching on EvElemStart unnecessarily verbose. (Here&#8217;s a blog post on the xpath technique) Also, there was no particular reason for me to use pull parsing &#8211; push parsing might have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] queries in Scala, which probably makes my pattern matching on EvElemStart unnecessarily verbose. (Here&#8217;s a blog post on the xpath technique) Also, there was no particular reason for me to use pull parsing &#8211; push parsing might have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What do you get in a commercial Common Lisp implementation? by Ron</title>
		<link>http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/05/14/what-do-you-get-in-a-commercial-common-lisp-implementation/#comment-8020</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/05/14/what-do-you-get-in-a-commercial-common-lisp-implementation/#comment-8020</guid>
		<description>classica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>classica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on F# vs. Scala: an uninformed comparison by Steve</title>
		<link>http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/11/f-vs-scala-an-uninformed-comparison/#comment-8019</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/11/f-vs-scala-an-uninformed-comparison/#comment-8019</guid>
		<description>I see Scala as being an easier sell than F# to people with an OO background.  The problem with just about any F# book you pick up, including the excellent one written by Jon Harrop, is that they contain an obligatory chapter on OO and spend the rest of their time illustrating the solution of problems in a purely functional way.  This definitely made it hard for me to do much with F#, as I sensed that the best practice approach was to compose things in a functional manner first and bring OO in much later if at all, which is the opposite of how I like to think.

Scala on the other hand enhances the capabilities of Java&#039;s OO system by including traits, better encapsulation mechanisms, case classes, etc.  You could use Scala for these features and never do anything remotely functional, and you would develop better code than with Java/C#, especially given the legibility that implicits bring to the table.  With the ability to also work in a functional manner, one can gradually pick up both paradigms at whatever pace is most natural.

One thing that I have to say when it comes to F# is that I find the culture encourages less readable code than does Scala.  Having great HM support seems to mean that (and again, this is going from the books) F# programmers do not write many type annotations.  The fact that these are required in Scala at least for parameters to methods has meant that it is easier for me to reason about what my code means after being away from it for some time, which was not the case in F#.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Scala as being an easier sell than F# to people with an OO background.  The problem with just about any F# book you pick up, including the excellent one written by Jon Harrop, is that they contain an obligatory chapter on OO and spend the rest of their time illustrating the solution of problems in a purely functional way.  This definitely made it hard for me to do much with F#, as I sensed that the best practice approach was to compose things in a functional manner first and bring OO in much later if at all, which is the opposite of how I like to think.</p>
<p>Scala on the other hand enhances the capabilities of Java&#8217;s OO system by including traits, better encapsulation mechanisms, case classes, etc.  You could use Scala for these features and never do anything remotely functional, and you would develop better code than with Java/C#, especially given the legibility that implicits bring to the table.  With the ability to also work in a functional manner, one can gradually pick up both paradigms at whatever pace is most natural.</p>
<p>One thing that I have to say when it comes to F# is that I find the culture encourages less readable code than does Scala.  Having great HM support seems to mean that (and again, this is going from the books) F# programmers do not write many type annotations.  The fact that these are required in Scala at least for parameters to methods has meant that it is easier for me to reason about what my code means after being away from it for some time, which was not the case in F#.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Joe Gregorio&#8217;s clever alternative to CAPTCHAs by cgreality</title>
		<link>http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/17/joe-gregorios-clever-alternative-to-captchas/#comment-8018</link>
		<dc:creator>cgreality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://metacircular.wordpress.com/2007/02/17/joe-gregorios-clever-alternative-to-captchas/#comment-8018</guid>
		<description>За последнее время популярность покупок недвижимости в Черногории возрастает. Во-первых, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cgreality.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;недвижимость в Черногории&lt;/a&gt; - прекрасное вложение инвестиций. Во-вторых, недвижимость в Черногории можно применить и для личного сезонного отдыха. Для россиян нет никаких препятствий для приобретения недвижимости в Черногории, на берегу Адриатического моря. Кроме того, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dvoriki.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;квартиры в Черногории&lt;/a&gt; гораздо дешевле, чем скажем, у нас в Сочи. Соседняя страна - &lt;a href=&quot;http://slo.cgreality.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Словения&lt;/a&gt; также предоставляет возможность покупки недвижимость. Для приобретения недвижимости в Словении нужно образовать фирму на территории этой страны с капиталом не менее 10.000 евро. Для того чтобы попасть в Словению - достаточно сделать обычную визу в Европу. Словения - член Евросоюза. Приобретая недвижимость в Словении, вы становитесь жителем одной из самых живописных стран мира. &lt;a href=&quot;http://slo.cgreality.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Квартиры в Словении&lt;/a&gt; также вполне доступны по цене.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>За последнее время популярность покупок недвижимости в Черногории возрастает. Во-первых, <a href="http://www.cgreality.ru" rel="nofollow">недвижимость в Черногории</a> &#8211; прекрасное вложение инвестиций. Во-вторых, недвижимость в Черногории можно применить и для личного сезонного отдыха. Для россиян нет никаких препятствий для приобретения недвижимости в Черногории, на берегу Адриатического моря. Кроме того, <a href="http://www.dvoriki.com" rel="nofollow">квартиры в Черногории</a> гораздо дешевле, чем скажем, у нас в Сочи. Соседняя страна &#8211; <a href="http://slo.cgreality.ru" rel="nofollow">Словения</a> также предоставляет возможность покупки недвижимость. Для приобретения недвижимости в Словении нужно образовать фирму на территории этой страны с капиталом не менее 10.000 евро. Для того чтобы попасть в Словению &#8211; достаточно сделать обычную визу в Европу. Словения &#8211; член Евросоюза. Приобретая недвижимость в Словении, вы становитесь жителем одной из самых живописных стран мира. <a href="http://slo.cgreality.ru" rel="nofollow">Квартиры в Словении</a> также вполне доступны по цене.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
